Business Associate Agreements Between Covered Entities

During our mock HIPAA audit process, we always verify Business Associate Agreements (BAAs) for our clients who are either Covered Entities (CEs) or Business Associates (BAs). In the process of deciding which BAAs are required, we are often asked about what agreement needs to be in place between two CEs who are working together.

For instance, one physician may refer a patient to a specialist physician. The first physician may send over medical records to the specialist. My clients want to know if a BAA is required between these two physicians.

At first glance, it seems as though a BAA might be required. Let’s look at the law itself:

The answer, it turns out, is that two CEs both treating the same patient do not need a BAA to share Protected Health Information (PHI).

Alternatively, there could be a situation where two Covered Entities want to work together and share PHI for patients that aren’t being treated by both CEs. In that case, a Covered Entity can also be classified as a Business Associate requiring a Business Associate Agreement between the two organizations.

It is unusual for a Covered Entity to be a BA of another Covered Entity, but it does happen. For instance, two research hospitals might be working together on a research project. They may share PHI in the course of their research. If both CEs aren’t treating the patient, depending on other circumstances, the two hospitals may need a BAA on file

If your situation doesn’t involve caring for the same patient, double check the law and see if you need a Business Associate Agreement.

If you fall into the majority by only sharing PHI with other CEs who are also treating your patient, you should not need a formal agreement drawn up and signed.